Glossary – International Day of Democracy

by | Sep 15, 2025 | Culture, Musings, Pedagogy

Assemblies – Gatherings where people meet face-to-face to deliberate and make decisions collectively.
Commons – Resources (land, water, knowledge, digital spaces) shared and governed by communities rather than controlled by markets or states.
Consensus – A decision-making process aiming for agreements everyone can support, not just majority wins.
Decentralization – Shifting power from centralized authorities to local communities or multiple smaller decision-making bodies.
Deliberation – Careful, inclusive discussion where people listen, weigh evidence, and reason together before making decisions.
Direct Participation – Citizens directly shape policies and choices, rather than delegating authority only to representatives.
Horizontalism – Non-hierarchical organizing, where power and responsibility are distributed equally among participants.
Intersectional Justice – Recognizing and addressing overlapping systems of oppression (such as racism, sexism, and classism) within democratic practice.
Mutual Aid – Networks of people supporting each other’s needs through cooperation and solidarity.
Pluralism – Welcoming and valuing diverse perspectives, cultures, and identities in shaping decisions.
Prefigurative Politics – Living out democratic values in the present, creating small-scale examples of the society we hope to build.
Transparency – Openness and accessibility in decision-making, ensuring accountability and trust.
Voice – Ensuring all people, especially marginalized groups, have a meaningful say in decisions that affect them.

The Inevitable Task of Each of Us: Tony Futura and the Geographies of Consumption

by | Aug 20, 2025 | Culture, Episodes, Exhibitions, Geographers, Musings, Rhythmanalysis, Theory

Tony Futura’s The Inevitable Task of Each of Us transforms a familiar object — the shopping cart — into a slide. At first glance, the piece is playful, even absurd: an everyday tool of commerce reimagined as a structure of leisure. But the title pushes us toward a more sobering reading. Shopping, Futura suggests, is no longer simply a choice but an inevitable task, a cycle that structures the rhythms of modern life.

Consumerism as Play and Cage

By bending the shopping cart into a slide, Futura infantilizes the act of consumption. Shopping is sold to us as entertainment — the mall as playground, the supermarket as spectacle — a cultural script where buying becomes fun. Yet the slide also signals inevitability: once you’re on it, you can’t stop midway, you can’t change direction. The ride is thrilling, but it ends not in liberation, only in containment within the cart’s metal grid.

Here the paradox emerges: the consumer is simultaneously free to choose and structurally confined. The cart promises infinite possibility, yet its very design disciplines our behavior. We move down its chute, again and again, in a loop that mirrors the repetitive routines of consumption.

From Citizen to Consumer

This is where the work resonates with one of The Geographical Imaginations Expedition & Institute’s central themes: the tension between citizen and consumer.

Citizenship implies agency — participation in collective decision-making, shaping futures, engaging in public life. Consumption, on the other hand, is framed as obligation. The sculpture’s title, The Inevitable Task of Each of Us, evokes civic duty, but here that duty has been redefined: not to vote, not to deliberate, not to act politically, but to shop.

Neoliberal societies increasingly conflate economic activity with civic participation. To “support the economy” becomes the equivalent of exercising one’s civic voice. Even ethical or “green” consumption is often framed as the highest form of responsibility, placing solutions to systemic crises back onto individual shoppers. In this way, the consumer displaces the citizen as the dominant social identity.

The Geographies of Everyday Life

The shopping cart-slide is more than a clever object; it is a spatial allegory. It directs our attention to the geographies where this shift plays out:

  • Supermarkets: gridded aisles channeling bodies and choices into predictable flows.
  • Shopping malls: privatized public squares where consumer activity stands in for civic engagement.
  • Amazon warehouses and delivery systems: invisible infrastructures sustaining the endless slide of consumption, while erasing the worker’s presence from the consumer’s experience.

These are the landscapes of everyday life in late capitalism — places where our identities are shaped less by citizenship than by our roles as consumers. Futura’s sculpture stages this reality in miniature: we climb, we descend, we repeat.

A Satire of Freedom

The irony, and the sharpness of Futura’s critique, lies in the way the work sells us the illusion of joy. The slide suggests freedom, pleasure, and childlike abandon. But the structure itself — welded from the rigid metal of the cart — reveals that our movement is already scripted. What appears playful is in fact disciplinary.

Here, Jean Baudrillard’s analysis of consumer society comes to mind: objects seduce us with the promise of freedom while quietly binding us within systems of control. Futura captures this paradox with elegance and wit, delivering a sculpture that is at once comic, critical, and unnervingly true.

Conclusion

The Inevitable Task of Each of Us is more than a surreal sculpture; it is a mirror held up to contemporary life. It shows us how the consumer has replaced the citizen, how the slide of consumption has become our daily ritual, and how the very spaces we inhabit — malls, markets, warehouses — reinforce this transformation.

Futura’s brilliance lies in his ability to make this critique both accessible and unsettling. The work seduces with humor but leaves us with unease: are we citizens shaping the world, or merely consumers sliding endlessly through it?

The Bad Bunny Effect

by | Aug 12, 2025 | Cartographics, Culture, Geo-Storytelling, Geographers, Musings, Rhythmanalysis

At The Geographical Imagination Expedition & Institute (The GIEI), we have been closely watching what some call “the Bad Bunny effect.” From lyrical storytelling to intricate stagecraft, Benito Antonio Martínez Ocasio has emerged as more than a global music star—he is participating in the active re-mapping of Puerto Rico in the cultural imagination. His No Me Quiero Ir De Aquí residency has not merely been a series of performances; it has been a cartographic intervention in the stories told about place, belonging, and identity. But how, exactly, has he been reshaping the geographies of Puerto Rican life and diaspora? And in our own fascination with his work, how might we be over-romanticizing—or oversimplifying—what’s at stake?  Here are some initial thoughts on the matter:

 

1. Reconfiguring Spatial Power — Centro vs. Periferia

By anchoring a world-class residency in Puerto Rico, Bad Bunny has reversed the typical flow of cultural gravity. Instead of chasing audiences to New York, Los Angeles, or Madrid, he has drawn them to San Juan, placing the island—not the metropole—at the symbolic center. This move resists the “periphery” status so often assigned to colonized and semi-colonized territories.

Are we interpreting this as a genuine reversal of spatial hierarchies, or are we projecting a center/periphery binary that still reinforces colonial geographic frames?

 

2. Geopolitical Resistance & Postcolonial Messaging

Through his residency and recent album, Bad Bunny has folded anti-colonial sentiment into mainstream entertainment. Lyrics, visuals, and public statements have taken aim at displacement, gentrification, and the cultural consequences of Puerto Rico’s political status.

To what extent does the residency’s political message genuinely confront U.S.–Puerto Rico colonial dynamics, and to what extent is our reading shaped by a desire for a coherent resistance narrative?

 

3. Cultural Geography through Stagecraft

The residency’s dual-stage design—mountainous rural landscapes on one side, a rooftop “marquesina” party on the other—has materialized memory and everyday Puerto Rican spaces. Chickens, plantain trees, and neighborhood gatherings have all been woven into the concert’s lived geography.

Do these scenic gestures create an authentic sense of place for local audiences, or do they risk aestheticizing and packaging Puerto Rican identity for consumption—even by Puerto Ricans themselves?

 

4. Tourism Reimagined: Economic Catalyst vs. Cultural Colonization

By attracting hundreds of thousands of visitors and generating massive economic returns, the residency has redefined Puerto Rico as a destination for cultural pilgrimage. Yet this influx inevitably reopens questions about who benefits, who is displaced, and how tourism reshapes local economies.

Are we too quick to celebrate this as a model of “community-centered tourism,” and how might we better interrogate the potential reproduction of harmful economic patterns?

 

5. Emotional Cartography: Identity, Memory, and Diaspora

For many Puerto Ricans in the diaspora, the residency has offered a symbolic homecoming, converting spatial absence into embodied presence. The concert has served as both ritual and refuge, a moment to root themselves again in a shared cultural geography.

How do we distinguish between collective emotional resonance and our own analytical romanticism about diasporic return?

 

Remaining in the Map

The No Me Quiero Ir De Aquí residency continues to unfold as both spectacle and spatial project. It has generated new ways of imagining Puerto Rico, reframed the island’s position in global cultural flows, and ignited debates about authenticity, economics, and belonging. Yet our interpretations remain provisional, shaped by the lenses we bring and the geographies we inhabit.

As the residency evolves, so too does the terrain of its meanings. Each performance adds layers to the map—some drawn by Bad Bunny, some by his audiences, and some by those of us trying to read the cartography in motion. The challenge is not to arrive at a final interpretation but to remain attentive to the shifting coordinates, the tensions, and the possibilities they open.

 

The Rhythm of Decadence: Sorrentino through Lefebvre

by | May 25, 2025 | Culture, Film Reviews, Geo-Storytelling, Musings, Rhythmanalysis, Theory

Paolo Sorrentino’s cinema is less about storytelling than attunement. His films, particularly Youth (2015) and La grande bellezza (2013), unfold as sensuous orchestrations of space, memory, and time. Critics often highlight their visual grandeur and thematic concern with aging, loss, and artistic decline, but what’s less commonly explored is their temporal structure: how Sorrentino builds meaning not through causality, but through repetition, cadence, and affective pulse.

Both films center on aging artists reflecting on what remains after beauty fades or success passes. Yet they are not narrative arcs in the conventional sense; they are rhythmic meditations, where form echoes theme. The rhythm of a party, the silence of a mountain spa, the ghostly recurrence of memory—these aren’t just motifs, but organizing principles. Sorrentino doesn’t just show time passing—he renders time, textures it, loops it.

To understand these films more deeply, we can turn to the French philosopher Henri Lefebvre and his late work, Rhythmanalysis—a theory of how rhythm shapes everyday life, space, and subjectivity. Bringing Lefebvre into dialogue with Youth and La grande bellezza reveals how Sorrentino functions not merely as a visual stylist, but as a cinematic rhythmanalyst of modern decadence.

In Rhythmanalysis, Lefebvre invites us to “listen” to spaces—to perceive the rhythms that underlie the everyday, from the cyclical (bodily, natural, cosmic) to the linear (industrial, capitalist, institutional). Rhythms, he argues, are not simply patterns but affective structures that shape how we inhabit time and space. Sorrentino’s Youth unfolds within just such a space: a luxurious Swiss spa suspended between stasis and slow decay. Here, rhythm is everything. The days pass in ritual repetition—meals, massages, walks, musical rehearsals. It is a site where the body’s rhythms, and those of the natural world, hold dominion over the mechanical tempo of modern life. Fred Ballinger, the retired composer played with great restraint by Michael Caine, withdraws from the linear time of artistic legacy—refusing to conduct, refusing to be summoned back into a world governed by external clocks. Instead, he drifts into a more internal, affective rhythm: one built from memory, regret, and the quiet pulse of lived embodiment.

This is where Sorrentino’s form mirrors Lefebvre’s theory most elegantly. The film’s structure itself is organized not by narrative progression but by repetition and return. Characters reappear in ritual fashion—the levitating monk, the child violinist, Miss Universe undressing in the bath—each cycling back with the regularity of a bell toll or a heartbeat. The camera, too, obeys these logics of drift and glide. Scenes do not so much progress as they accumulate resonance through recurrence. Even the editing obeys a kind of choreographic sensibility: elliptical, lulling, suggestive of dream rather than plot. The rhythms are stable, but they are also hollowed out, stripped of forward motion. What Lefebvre would call eurhythmia—the harmonious interplay of temporalities—becomes, in Youth, a gently melancholic arrhythmia, where life continues without propulsion.

One of the film’s most compelling figures in this regard is the unnamed former sports legend, unmistakably modeled on Diego Maradona. Bloated, largely silent, and trailed by an oxygen tank, he functions as a literal embodiment of disrupted rhythm. Once defined by physical precision and tempo, he is now weighed down by breath, unable to sustain the athletic time that once governed him. Sorrentino stages him almost as a visual counter-rhythm—his stillness and decline set against the ambient luxury of the spa, whose inhabitants remain, at least superficially, in motion. If the spa is a site of cyclical repetition—meant to restore—the former athlete exposes the limits of rhythm itself. Some patterns, once broken, cannot resume.

If Youth is a kind of chamber piece—a quiet study in temporal suspension—La grande bellezza is its urban symphony, sprawling and cacophonous. Here, the city of Rome is not just a setting but a field of overlapping, colliding rhythms. The protagonist, Jep Gambardella, glides through the city’s pulse like a ghost: parties, funerals, botox appointments, avant-garde performance art, all stitched together in a looping sequence of spectacle and ennui. Rome, in Sorrentino’s vision, is both eternal and exhausted—its architectural grandeur a kind of rhythmic residue of lost meanings. The film’s opening sequence, with its sudden jump from a choir performance to a decadent rooftop party, immediately sets up the film’s dialectic between sacred and profane rhythms. What looks at first like eurhythmia—the layering of different temporalities—is quickly revealed to be a hollow choreography, one that Jep both participates in and silently critiques.

Jep’s rhythm, like Fred’s, is one of refusal. He is a flâneur without direction, drifting rather than progressing, attuned not to productivity but to sensation. Sorrentino’s camera mimics this languor, often circling or hovering, privileging mood over action. Like Lefebvre’s rhythmanalyst, Jep is both observer and participant—caught within the social and spatial rhythms of his city, but also distanced from them, listening for a beat that never quite returns. The film is saturated with beautiful surfaces—rituals, performances, processions—but all of them feel like echoes. The past persists as form, but not as meaning. Rome becomes the site of what Lefebvre might call an arrhythmic beauty: structured, repetitive, but ultimately out of joint.

Across both films, Sorrentino renders rhythm not simply as an aesthetic device but as a mode of critique. These are works concerned with the bodily and social textures of time: the way repetition can sustain or drain, how rhythm can be both life-giving and death-dealing. Aging, in Sorrentino’s hands, is not just physical decline—it is a disruption of one’s capacity to inhabit rhythm. To grow old is to fall out of sync: with culture, with vitality, with the very mechanisms of meaning-making. Yet Sorrentino’s cinema doesn’t mourn this disruption so much as dwell in it, extending its temporality, letting us feel its strange, elegiac beauty.

What Sorrentino’s cinema ultimately offers to the critic is not a puzzle to decode, but a texture to inhabit—a kind of phenomenological rhythm that resists reductive explanation. To engage seriously with Youth and La grande bellezza is to move beyond questions of narrative or even theme, and instead to tune into the temporal architectures of the films themselves. In doing so, we begin to see criticism not only as interpretation, but as a rhythmic practice in its own right—an act of attunement, of watching with the body as much as the eye. Sorrentino invites us to listen closely: to beauty, to boredom, to silence, to time. The critic’s task, then, is not to resolve these rhythms, but to move with them—gracefully, attentively, and above all, in time.

Crossing the Abyss: Thomas Merton, the Geographical Imagination, and the Journey of Global Citizenship

by | May 22, 2025 | Culture, Geo-Storytelling, Geographers, Musings, Pedagogy, Theory

In an age marked by technological marvels and unprecedented connectivity, the words of Thomas Merton strike a timeless chord:

What can we gain by sailing to the moon if we are not able to cross the abyss that separates us from ourselves? This is the most important of all voyages of discovery.

With this reflection, Merton challenges the notion that outward achievement—symbolized by space exploration—can substitute for inward awareness. While humanity continues to chart the outer edges of the universe, he reminds us that the deepest and most necessary discoveries lie within. This idea takes on new significance when we consider our understanding of the world through our geographical imaginations and our responsibilities as global citizens.

Geographical Imaginations: How We Know the World

The geographical imagination refers to the ways individuals and societies envision the world and its people—often shaped by culture, history, media, education, and power. It is through this imagination that we form mental maps of distant places, understand global relationships, and develop emotional responses to unfamiliar cultures. However, this process is not neutral. It can be infused with stereotypes, shaped by colonial legacies, or distorted by economic and political agendas.

In Merton’s metaphor, the “abyss” is not just the chasm within the individual but also the gap between how we imagine the world and its complex realities. If we do not reflect critically on how our worldviews are formed, we risk reinforcing systems of misunderstanding and marginalization. Without this introspection, our engagement with other cultures becomes superficial or exploitative, cloaked in curiosity but driven by control.

The Inner Journey and Global Citizenship

To be a global citizen is to recognize one’s interconnectedness with people and places far beyond national borders. It means understanding global systems—environmental, economic, cultural, and political—and acting in ways that promote justice, sustainability, and mutual respect. Yet, as Merton suggests, one cannot truly be a global citizen without first engaging in the inward journey: questioning our assumptions, recognizing our privileges, and becoming aware of the ways we have been shaped by our surroundings.

This inward reflection is not a retreat from the world but a necessary preparation for authentic global engagement. It transforms curiosity into empathy, and knowledge into wisdom. When Merton speaks of the “most important of all voyages of discovery,” he is calling for a kind of consciousness that allows us not only to see the world but to see ourselves in relation to it — as participants, not just observers.

Reframing Exploration

Merton’s critique of the moon landing is not a condemnation of progress, but a call to reframe what it means to explore. The heroic narratives of discovery and conquest—whether of new worlds or new markets—often ignore the inner void that can accompany unchecked ambition. Without a corresponding moral and spiritual evolution, such explorations can deepen divisions and alienation.

The geographical imagination, when rooted in self-awareness, becomes a powerful tool for connection. It allows us to move beyond simplistic images of “the Other” and toward more nuanced understandings of different peoples and places. It helps cultivate a form of global citizenship that is not about possessing knowledge, but about participating in a shared human story.

Bridging the Divide

Thomas Merton’s insight remains urgent today. As we chart paths across continents and into space, we must also chart the terrain of our own consciousness. We must question how we know what we know, and whose voices have been silenced in the stories we tell about the world. The “abyss that separates us from ourselves” is also the distance between surface-level engagement and true global solidarity.

To cross that abyss is to become not just travelers, but pilgrims—seeking not only knowledge of the world, but wisdom in our place within it. It is the most important of all voyages, and one that begins within.

 

Espiello 2025 #5: Walking the Wounds, Filming the Unwritten

by | Apr 5, 2025 | Culture, Film Reviews, Spain

There are films that speak through language, and there are films that speak through rhythm and presence. El arte de los analfabetos, directed by Kevin Castellano and Edu Hirschfeld, belongs to the latter. A deeply personal and visually resonant documentary, it retraces the life of Kevin’s grandfather Antonio—born in the street, raised in motion, and silenced by memory.

But this is not simply a story told in retrospect. It is a film made in motion, a road documentary where walking becomes both method and metaphor. The camera follows Kevin along a pilgrimage of inheritance, tracing the long path Antonio once walked with his father from Valencia to the Pyrenees. Through this reenactment—part memory, part mourning—cinema becomes an instrument not of explanation, but of accompaniment.

From the Archive of the Body

The trailer offers us glimpses of a stripped-down, intimate journey: footsteps echoing through forests, long stretches of rural road, the quiet hush of old places remembered but changed. There are no sweeping scores or stylized reenactments—just the patient unfolding of memory through place. The voiceover does not impose meaning; it opens questions. What happens when trauma is too heavy to narrate? Can memory survive outside the written word?

This is a film about the ethnography of the unsaid. Antonio, who once tried to write his life but gave up because remembering was too painful, becomes the absent presence guiding the film. Kevin’s journey is not only filial—it is archival. Each landscape passed, each meal shared, each pause in breath becomes a site of memory, a trigger, a gesture of care toward a past that resists language.

A Cinema of Absence and Intimacy

Visually, the documentary follows a quiet, grounded aesthetic. Shot by Castellano himself, the cinematography reflects an ethic of closeness and restraint. It is not flashy—it is honest. Faces are filmed with tenderness. Landscapes are given time to breathe. In one shot, we see a page fluttering in the wind, a metaphor for memory’s fragility. In another, Kevin sits with his grandfather, not speaking but being there—an image more powerful than dialogue.

This is cinema that listens, that walks alongside its subject rather than in front of it. Its emotional power lies in what it refuses to dramatize. The absence of archival footage, the simplicity of the narration, the quietude of the score—all these choices create space for the viewer to feel rather than be told.

A Testament to the Unwritten

El arte de los analfabetos is not only about Antonio’s story; it is about the many lives that go undocumented because they do not fit into neat historical boxes. It honors the knowledge carried in bodies, in gestures, in routes taken again and again across generations. It reminds us that writing is not the only way to remember—that some stories must be walked, lived, and filmed.

Within the frame of Espiello 2025’s theme, Memory: Inhabiting Oblivion, this film is a luminous contribution. It inhabits the margins—not to illuminate them with bright lights, but to show us how people survive in the shade. Through its simplicity and care, it makes a powerful claim: those who cannot write still have stories to tell—and cinema can help carry them forward.